The
Process of
How
to Build an Atomic Bomb
With a few parts from a hardware store and some
know-how, it is possible to build a weapon of mass destruction.
Well, as long as you can find a few pounds of plutonium on Ebay
to fuel it.
In 1905 Albert Einstein
wrote a number of revolutionary physics papers including his Special
Theory of Relativity. One of the formulas that came out of this,
almost as an afterthought, was E=mc˛. That is: energy is
equal to mass times the speed of light squared. What Einstein
was saying is that matter - everything around us we can touch
and see - is actually the same thing as energy, just in a different
form. The upshot of this is that it should be possible to convert
energy to matter or, visa versa, convert matter to energy.
|
A-bomb
vs. H-bomb

A 10 megaton H-bomb test.
|
An A-bomb ( or
atomic bomb) is generally considered to be one based
on the fission principal - that is the splitting of atoms.
An H-bomb (or hydrogen bomb) is based on the principal
of fusion, that is the fusing of atoms together. H-bombs
are generally much more powerful than A-bombs. The largest
A-bomb tops out at the equivalent of 0.7 megatons of TNT,
while the largest H-bomb ever produced was 50 megatons.
The heat and pressures needed in order to get an H-bomb's
fusion reaction going, however, can only be produced on
earth at the heart of a fission bomb, so in effect every
H-bomb has an A-bomb as a part of its mechanism
|
The energy we release every day when driving our
car or cooking on a stove comes from chemical reactions.
Two or more chemicals react through the motion of electrons and
the forming and breaking of chemical bonds. One familiar form
of chemical reaction is combustion. For example, the oxygen in
the air reacts with the substances in a candle to release heat
and light. In chemical reactions the amount of matter involves
never changes, if you were able to capture all the soot, smoke
and carbon dioxide released by the candle you would find they
weigh exactly the same amount as the original candle and oxygen
that reacted with it. The material changed form and released energy
but did not disappear.
Einstein's formula suggested that it was possible
to get energy by what we now call a nuclear reaction. This is
the conversion of matter to energy. What's more, the amount of
energy available in even a small amount of matter is, according
to the formula, tremendous. Matter is just sort of a condensed
version of energy, but it isn't a one-to-one relationship. The
conversion factor is the speed of light (already a huge number)
squared (which makes it a really big number). We can picture this
relationship by thinking about water and steam. You can cool steam
(think of this as the energy) down and it becomes water (think
of this as matter) or heat water up to make steam. It takes a
lot of steam to create a few drops of water though, but only few
a ounces of water to create a whole room full of steam. The same
is true of energy and matter. In the atomic bomb that destroyed
Hiroshima only 600 milligrams of uranium (less than the weight
of a dime) was converted to energy, but it released the same amount
of power as at least 13,000 tons of the conventional chemical
explosive TNT.
Converting matter to energy is no easy trick, however.
The sun does it naturally by a process called fusion. The
sun, a gigantic ball of mostly hydrogen gas, has intense pressures
and heat created at its core by its gravity. It is under this
heat and pressure that the hydrogen atoms fuse to create helium
and release energy. Re-creating the intense conditions required
to generate fusion on earth isn't easy, however, so atomic bombs
uses another process called fission.
|

1)A
neutron strikes a uranium atom 2)The uranium atom is split
into a krypton atom and a barium atom releasing some binding
energy along with more neutrons. 3)The neutrons strike other
uranium atoms starting the process all over again.
(Copyright Lee Krystek, 2007)
|
Fission
Reactions
A fission reaction is just the opposite of fusion.
Instead of atoms being put together, they are split into pieces.
When a neutron (a subatomic particle) with enough energy hits
an atom of radioactive material like uranium, the uranium atom
will split into two smaller atoms and some of the energy that
held the original atom together is released. If the right type
of uranium is used, the split will also release additional neutrons
capable of splitting other atoms. If this process continues with
each new split releasing neutrons which in turn split other atoms
it is called a chain reaction. Because of the speed involved
in a nuclear reaction, billions of atoms can be split in a tiny
fraction of a second. If the reaction proceeds at a sedate level
the fission produces energy in a controllable manner. This is
what is going on in the heart of a nuclear power plant. The energy
released is used to heat water to the point of steam and the steam
spins turbines connected to generators to make electricity. If
the reaction proceeds at an uncontrolled level, however, a nuclear
explosion can result.
This might seem to make nuclear power plants potential
atomic bombs, but the uranium used in the plants is not the type
that could sustain a reaction at a rate high enough to cause an
explosion by itself (nuclear power plants are subject to explosions
caused by steam pressure and other non-nuclear forces, however).
In fact, engineering a device that does not tear itself apart
before the explosion really gets underway is one of the main design
problems of building a bomb.
Bomb
Design
Uranium or plutonium can be used as fuel for atomic
bombs. Both are highly radioactive. This means they are constantly
shedding subatomic particles including neutrons. Only certain
isotopes of these materials - like uranium 235 and plutonium 239
- consistently give off neutrons of such high energy that they
will split atoms. When enough of the material is put together,
a chain reaction starts and the mass is said to be critical.
The term used for a mass of radioactive material with a growing
chain reaction, splitting more and more atoms with each moment,
is supercritical. While putting enough uranium 235 together
in a single mass will make it supercritical (and create a surge
of radiation that will kill you if you are standing near it unprotected
- see "A Supercritical Accident" below) it is
not enough to create a bomb. The material must be held in a compressed
state long enough for the reaction to take place while resisting
the initial energy of the explosion that will try and tear it
apart. There are two well-known approaches to doing this. The
first is known as the "gun" method.
The
Gun Method
|

A
conventional explosive drives the uranium "bullet"
into the "spike;" bringing the mass to supercritical
and causing the detonation. (Copyright
Lee Krystek, 2007)
|
The "gun" is the simplest way to build a nuclear
weapon. The atomic bomb used on Hiroshima during World War II
used this approach. The weapon consists of a tube (much like the
barrel of a gun) with half the nuclear charge fixed at one end
and the other half (the moving half) at the opposite end. A conventional
explosive charge was placed behind the moving portion which can
be thought of as the "bullet." When the conventional charge is
detonated, the bullet races down the tube and slams into the fixed
charge at the other end (referred to as the "spike").
Once the two halves of the nuclear fuel are brought together and
held together long enough, the chain reaction starts, the fuel
goes supercritical and the explosion takes place.
While the gun method is easy to engineer, it has
some drawbacks. The biggest one is the need to make sure the two
parts of nuclear fuel come together rapidly enough. As the two
sections get about an inch apart, they will start exchanging neutrons
that might start a chain reaction. If the two parts go supercritical
before they get close enough, the force of the energy released
will blow them apart before the main explosion gets underway.
This type of failure is known as a "fizzle."
Another problem is that this method is less efficient,
requiring between 20 and 25 kilograms (around 44 to 55 pounds)
of uranium. Other approaches can use as little as 15 kilograms
(about 33 pounds). Given that weapon's grade uranium and plutonium
are very hard to get, this is a real disadvantage.
Also, the gun method only works if the uranium is
being used as the fuel. The process of creating plutonium generally
causes it to be contaminated with other materials which increase
the chance of it going supercritical before the two sections are
close enough together. This, in turn, increases the chances of
a fizzle instead of a blast. To make the gun method work reliably
with plutonium, you would have to increase the speed with which
the "bullet" approached the "spike" significantly. To do this
would mean making the tube impracticality long.
The
Implosion Design
|

Conventional
explosives press on the "tamper/pusher," compressing
the plutonium until it reaches a supercritical mass. The
initiator floods the area with neutrons to help get the
chain reaction going. (Copyright Lee Krystek,
2007)
|
For this reason, if you use plutonium to fuel a
bomb you need to use the more sophisticated "implosion" method.
With this approach the nuclear fuel is shaped into a sphere (called
the "pit"). Conventional explosives are put around it. When these
are detonated the force of the explosion squeezes the pit into
a supercritical mass long enough for the explosion to take place.
While the principle sounds easy, it is difficult to actually make
it work. The pit cannot simply be surrounded by high explosives.
The shock wave that compresses it must be precisely spherical,
otherwise the pit material will escape out through a weak point.
To create the necessary explosive force in a perfect sphere, shaped
explosive charges (sometimes called explosive lens) are used.
The "fatman" bomb the leveled Nagasaki in World War II used 32
charges arranged around the pit like the faces of a soccer ball.
In order to create the spherical shock wave it isn't only necessary
to get the charges in the right position with the right shape,
but they must be detonated at exactly the right time. A charge
that detonates late will create a hole in the shock wave through
which the pit can escape.
Implosion designs also require a neutron trigger
or "initiator" to flood the pit with neutrons during detonation.
In "fatman" this was done with a small sphere with layers of beryllium
and polonium separated by thin gold foil placed in the center
of the pit. An implosion design may also include other layers
between the explosives and the pit to create a more powerful explosion.
These include a "pusher" (designed to increase the explosive shock
wave hitting the pit), a "tamper" (to help the pit from blowing
apart too quickly once the explosion starts), and a "reflector"
composed of a material that will reflect neutrons back in the
pit increasing the amount of fission. In some bomb designs these
functions are integrated into a single layer of material.
The implosion design is generally considered to
be superior in almost every way to the gun design and it is the
choice for any organization with the resources to design and construct
it. One of the major advantages of this approach is that it is
easy to make the implosion design more efficient by increasing
the effectiveness of the conventional explosives. For example,
if the pit is squeezed so that the density is doubled during detonation
it may yield a 10-kiloton explosion. If that same pit can be compressed
to three times its original density, a 40-kiloton explosion can
be generated with no additional nuclear fuel. The longer the fission
material is allowed to react, the bigger the explosion.
|
A
Supercritical Accident

The plutonium sphere resting
in the fatal testbed.
|
In 1945 an atomic
bomb worker, Harry K. Daghlian Jr, was killed while experimenting
with plutonium. The test was designed to see just how much
of a neutron reflector was needed to push the sphere of
plutonium to the edge of going supercritical with the experimenter
gauging how close he was getting by listening to a Geiger
counter. As he moved the final "brick" of reflective material
close to the sphere he realized he should not place it in
position, but then it slipped from his hand. Daghlian knocked
the brick away, but it was too late. The sphere went supercritical
with a flash of blue light. He was exposed to 510 REMs of
radiation and after an agonizing illness, died 28 days later.
|
Could
You Build a Bomb?
Building a basic nuclear weapon is not easy, but
not all that hard either. In 1964 the U.S. Army decided to see
just how difficult it was. They hired two professors that had
Ph.Ds in physics, but no experience with nuclear weapons or access
to nuclear secrets. The two were given the task of designing an
atomic bomb using only information available to the general public.
It took them roughly two years, but in the end they designed an
implosion style weapon that could have been made in a local machine
shop which could have produced an explosion similar to the Hiroshima
bomb.
The only thing that they found extremely difficult
to do was to get the proper material to fuel the bomb: uranium
235 or plutonium 239. Only a tiny fraction of natural uranium
that is mined from the ground is isotope 235 and separating it
from the other isotopes is a major chore requiring huge factory
complexes working years to isolate just a few pounds. In fact,
most weapons programs get around this by utilizing plutonium,
which is very rarely in found nature at all, but can be created
by exposing more common types of uranium to radiation in a nuclear
"breeder" reactor. Plutonium is extremely difficult to handle,
however. It is one of the most toxic materials known to man, especially
if inhaled.
It is the difficulty of getting and handling these
fissionable materials that protects us from people building nuclear
bombs in their basements. It is for this reason nonproliferation
of nuclear material is a major concern of most governments and
there is great apprehension about countries who want to build
nuclear reactors capable of "breeding" plutonium fuel. Knowledge
of how to build a bomb is hard to control. Fortunately, so far,
the materials needed have been much easier to keep track of.
But for how long?
Note all the information in
this article has been assembled from unclassified public materials
and fall short of the details necessary to build an actual weapon.
This article is for information purposes only, and in no way are
unauthorized persons encouraged to construct weapons of any sort.
Copyright Lee Krystek
2007. All Rights Reserved.